Ron Paul Keeps Winning as Supporters Prepare For a Battle With GOP Old Guard

Four years ago, Nevada State GOP insiders so disliked Ron Paul supporters that they actually walked out of the state convention and turned off the lights behind them. In a windowless assembly room with some 2,000 people in it, one might imagine the terror this might cause. In what had been an otherwise orderly meeting, this move took place when it became clear that Ron Paul would sweep the Nevada delegation to the Republican National Convention. A bunch of Mr. Smith Goes to Washington types, inspired by Ron Paul, got involved in their party to effect change, and the party insiders didn’t like having these idealists around.

This year looks a little different. Ron Paul’s supporters have assumed a significant portion of the Republican Party leadership and Ron Paul’s supporters seem like they will show up in droves as delegates to assure their candidate is the best represented in Nevada. At the Nevada Republican Convention this year, 25 of the 28 Nevada delegates will be decided.

A showdown is ahead at the convention in the western corner of Nevada in the town of Sparks, where on Friday and Saturday, Ron Paul supporters will culminate their takeover of the Nevada GOP at all levels after being so brazenly rebuffed in 2008.

That showdown will be between the old guard of the Nevada GOP – the Romney-supporting, McCain-supporting, Bush-supporting neo-conservative establishment – and the more numerous and active conservative and libertarian base of the Nevada Republican Party.

Scheduled to speak the afternoon of May 5 at the state convention is Ron Paul himself.

The harder and more violently the GOP establishment fights the organized grassroots of the Republican Party, the more fervently those grassroots seem to fight back. “Blowback” is how the CIA refers to this phenomenon when referencing political struggles abroad. That same type of blowback seems to be taking place across the GOP. Another notable recent example being in Alaska, where the conservative and libertarian base of the Republican Party are pushing back against a moderate and corporatist establishment.

Alaska Republicans held a state convention last weekend that Politico hailed as “more evidence of the political maturation of the Paul forces, who are beginning to seize the levers of powers from within the state parties.” A Paul supporter was elected state chairman and Paul took at least a quarter of the delegates with him out of the Alaska Republican Convention. There is likely to be much controversy around this transition, however, as the Alaska Dispatch reports that the former state chairman took some $100,000 in party funds with him as he was removed from office by transferring it to a Republican organization that is friendlier to the state’s old guard.

The more intense these fights get, and the more success Ron Paul’s supporters see, the more notice they are generating around the county. “I just came back from the national (Republican National Committee) meeting and everybody was talking about the Ron Paul, well-organized takeover,” said Heidi Smith, Nevada national GOP committeewoman.

There is little question that Ron Paul is pushing hard for delegates and that his plan is starting to succeed.  Focusing on delegates is the strategy that Barack Obama used with success against an opponent with greater name recognition. The strategy worked for Obama and it seems to be working for Paul. At the Republican National Convention on August 27 in Tampa, Paul will be a force to be reckoned with. The RNC convenes \to choose a nominee and conduct the business of the party. Like any meeting convened under Robert’s Rules of Order, it is the delegates of that meeting who are the ultimate authority.

While the media and Republican establishment have concluded that a Romney-Obama race is a given, Republican voters do not yet seem to agree with that conclusion. After an estimated $80 million spent by the Romney campaign this election cycle and after five years of campaigning for the presidency, Romney has yet to appeal widely to Republican voters and bridge the divides in the party.

Voters are still left, therefore, with a two man race for the Republican nomination – either a moderate challenger (Mitt Romney) running against an incumbent president, which has been an unsuccessful option since at least 1976, or an ideological challenger to an incumbent president (Ron Paul).  In the years 1976, 1980, 1992, 1994, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2006, and 2008, national elections were either lost by moderates or won by principled candidates. It’s still not clear who the Republican delegates will rally around in 2012.

To win on the first ballot at the RNC, Mitt Romney needs 1,144 delegates to vote for him. If he doesn’t get that, he ends up in an ugly scenario where a floor fight is sure to take place. If Colorado, Missouri, or Minnesota are any indication, Santorum supporters and the religious right are likely to side with Paul over Romney.

National conventions are usually a coronation for an established candidate. That is not always the case, however. During a convention, anything can happen. Any political junky of a certain age remembers the drama inside and out of the 1968 Democratic convention. Political historians know that Warren Harding walked into the 1920 Republican National Convention with the support of only 7% of delegates, before being chosen as the Republican nominee at that convention on the tenth ballot, and elected president later that year.

According to an unnamed party official, a less principled candidate may fare better in a brokered convention: “An important difference between Paul and Romney is that Romney can horse-trade by promising sweetheart deals, influential positions, and government contracts, should he be elected. Ron Paul has only the promise that he will work his hardest to scale back the unconstitutional growth of government…. [Paul’s] philosophy on the role of government may limit how influential of a horse-trader he can be.”  Results over the last few weeks from states like Colorado, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, and Alaska tell us that that the Republicans don’t yet have a guaranteed frontrunner and guarantee us only one certainty at this point.

On the floor of the RNC, in late August, on primetime television, the American people will watch a political drama unfold in which the Republican old guard tries to horse-trade its way out of the pressure that has built up around it for years. The Mr. Smiths of the Republican Party are angry and organized and have worked their way into the highest levels of the Republican Party. They are the delegates of the highest legislative body of the Republican Party – the RNC. They have voice and vote to change the direction, structure, and leadership of the GOP, and in 2012 the Mr. Smiths of the GOP seem to like Ron Paul a whole lot better than they like Mitt Romney.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ron Paul Embarrasses Romney Campaign By Winning Louisiana Delegates

Ron Paul Embarrasses Romney Campaign By Winning Louisiana Delegates

Ron Paul’s campaign succesfully navigated a confusing ballot process in Louisiana to secure delegates at the state’s Republican convention.

Early reports indicate that Paul’s campaign won 5 of the 6 Congressional Districts in the Saturday, April 28 statewide vote, with a sixth district still up in the air. Analysis of the results estimates that upwards of 70% of the delegates to the Louisiana Republican Convention held in Shreveport, LA on June 2 will be composed entirely Ron Paul supporters. The delegates at the state convention then choose the majority of the delefates that get sent to the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida later this summer.

Louisiana is allotted a total of 46 delegates to the RNC. Twenty of those delegates were allocated to presidential contenders by primary voters, but those allocations are not finalized until the state convention when delegates can be differently allocated. Given Ron Paul’s success in the Louisiana delegate process, re-allocating the delegates is a likely option. Thirty-eight national delegates are chosen by the delegates to the state convention and an additional eight delegates are either party officials or chosen by party officials.

Romney supporters were in damage control mode Saturday, undermining Paul’s numerous caucus state victories and insisting that a broken process caused Romney an embarrassing finish in Louisiana. Romney supporter and Greater New Orleans Republican Chairwoman Sarah Roycomplimented Ron Paul’s campaign: “We congratulate Ron Paul supporters for apparently capturing their first state delegation in this Presidential election cycle through an excellent get out the vote effort today.”

In a statement released Saturday, Roy called for the party’s old guard to step down after pointing out that the results from Louisiana, in which Romney took only 8% of the delegates, would cause problems for him and his ardent supporter, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal. “This odd and undemocratic result unfortunately will embarrass and distract Governor Jindal, as he labors to pass his Legislative agenda, and presumed Presidential nominee Mitt Romney.”

The Ron Paul campaign’s Louisiana State Director Pete Chamberlain said of the victory, “Yesterday, Ron Paul’s dedicated Louisiana supporters showed what passionate, persistent activism can achieve when centered around a consistent message of freedom and prosperity.”

“Ron Paul’s victory shows his delegate-attainment strategy is working and demonstrates that the media and Washington pundits are underestimating his influence in the nominating process,”said Ron Paul 2012 National Campaign Manager John Tate.

The Louisiana results illustrate yet another example of a regular trend for this campaign cycle – Paul fairs well in the popular vote by usually taking second or third place and occasionally first, but then dominates the delegate process. As delegates are the ultimate decider of whom the party’s nominee will be, this technique was precisely the technique successfully used by President Obama’s 2008 campaign to defeat Hilary Clinton. As late as May 2008, then Senator Obama was still being referred to as unelectable in the media, until his delegate strategy started to show clear results.

Unofficial sources report that there was little organization or support among former Governor Mitt Romney’s, former Senator Rick Santorum’s, or former Speaker Newt Gingrich’s supporters in the process, while Paul’s supporters appeared heavily organized and involved in the process.

While former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum won the popular vote on March 24 in Louisiana, the April 28 delegate results show that Paul’s campaign has seized control of the Louisiana delegate process and is poised to take control of both the national delegation and the Louisiana State Republican Party.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ron Paul Still Winning Delegates in Rhode Island and Pennsylvania

In an unlikely turn of events, Ron Paul picked up a quarter of the delegates available in Rhode Island’s Republican primary election on Tuesday. The campaign also received an estimated 25% of the pledged delegates from the Pennsylvania primary.

Professor Josh Putnam, of Davidson College, shared what he calls a “rough, rough delegate count,” from Pennsylvania as primary results were being calculated. Putnam lists 16 or 17 delegates as “uncommitted/unconfirmed,” and divvies up the other 19 or 20 delegates among the campaigns as follows: Romney 7 (35%), Paul 5 (25%), Gingrich 4 (20%) and Santorum 3 or 4 (20%). Former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum suspended his race earlier this month, but remained on his home state’s ballot.

In what is a multistep process, which started with Tuesday’s loophole primary, Pennsylvania will send a total of 72 delegates to the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida in late August. Tuesday, a total of 59 delegates were chosen in Pennsylvania, but the allegiance of many of those delegates is difficult to identify.

In Washington last month, Paul supporters witnessed a united move by some of his opponents to marginalize his supporters. Some observers now speculate that Paul’s campaign may have supporters trying to avoid retribution by identifying themselves as “uncommitted,” as was the case in Colorado earlier this month, where Paul’s supporters gained the endorsement of that state’s GOP under the moniker “uncommitted.” Uncommitted delegates make up 44% of the 36 delegates that have been decided in Colorado. If this is the case in Pennsylvania, these numbers are likely to grow in Paul’s favor. That all this took place in former Governor Romney’s backyard, where conservative Christians are not heavily represented, sends a signal that the GOP nomination remains undecided.

This news comes on the heels of a successful weekend for the Paul campaign in which they took 20 of the 24 available national delegates in Minnesota. That momentum will send Paul into the Minnesota state convention, May 18-19, in control of 83% of the available delegates, and guarantees him at least 50% of Minnesota’s 40 delegates to the RNC.

New York, Delaware, and Connecticut also held primaries on April 24.

Ron Paul Still Winning Delegates in Rhode Island and Pennsylvania

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ron Paul Wins Minnesota, And Here’s How

Over the last several weeks, Minnesotans have gathered to choose delegates for the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida.

The nominating convention for the GOP is scheduled to convene on August 27. The process in Minnesota has come to its first leg of completion this weekend as the electors in Federal Congressional Districts 1, 2, 4, and 8 selected national delegates and handled other party business. Of the 24 possible delegates to come out of Minnesota during this process, 20 have pledged support to Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas). Two delegates are pledged to former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum and two others are of unknown affiliation.

On May 18 and 19, the Minnesota State Republican Party will convene to nominate 13 more delegates. Three party officials will also be sent as so-called “super-delegates” to the Tampa nominating convention, bringing the grand total of delegates who will represent Minnesota Republicans to 40. Analysis shows that Ron Paul has guaranteed himself a minimum of 50% of the delegates out of Minnesota and currently controls 83% of the already selected delegation compared to 8% for Senator Santorum and 0% for current GOP frontrunner, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.

While the popular vote was won by Santorum on February 7 in a non-binding straw poll, an organized effort was made by Ron Paul’s Minnesota supporters to win the more important delegate selection process. This strategy is similar to the strategy employed by then-Illinois Senator Barack Obama’s campaign team in 2008 to defeat an opponent with greater name recognition.

In an April 12 poll released by the conservative polling outfit Rasmussen, Paul is seen as leading President Obama in a head-to-head contest, making him the only GOP candidate to beat the incumbent president, while Governor Romney ties President Obama in the same race. This news comes on the heels of a campaign suspension by Santorum and may suggest that conservative Republicans are rallying around Paul in an “anyone-but-Romney” Republican race.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

From 52 Weeks in Slovakia: Is Slovakia Stuck in the 1950’s? – 13 Examples of How It Is

1950′s

March 30, 2012

Allan Stevo

Many people consider the past to be both old and bad.  I try not to assume that what is old is bad.  Nor do I believe that time necessarily brings progress.  For example, there are times when a person can look back and say, “We took a turn back there and it might have been  bad decision.”  Though time may have passed, spending years going down the wrong road is not progress.

Below I have listed items that I consider both admirable and worthy of mention.  These are aspects of Slovak culture, that, for all practical purposes, Americans once had and have generally parted with.  While I did not live in the 1950′s, so many Americans visiting Slovakia have said to me about Slovakia “Well, that’s sort of like how it was in the 1950′s,” that it’s hard to ignore this comparison.

I’d like to know what you think.  Does it sound like Slovakia is “stuck” in the 1950′s?  Is some of it good?  Is some of it bad?  I don’t intend to inspire any mindless nostalgia, but perhaps a discussion on what things about America’s past and Slovakia’s present are good and worthy of repetition.

Example 1 – Dressing Up to Go to Town

I’ve often been in situations in the U.S. where I see unsightly men and women going out for groceries in a way that makes them seem even more unsightly than they already are.  Perhaps they might wear pajamas or poorly fitting clothes, clothing with holes, or clothing that is so loose and revealing that it should only have be worn in private.  All of these and worse might appear at the grocery store, or the nearest Walmart, or on a person bouncing around town running errands.  Americans, in general, tend to be quite casual about how they dress in public.

Slovaks tend to have a very different attitude about how to dress when going to town.  It seems to be the case whether going to work, going shopping, or going out on both romantic and friendly dates.  One must make an effort to look good in town.

How very impressed I continue to be to see the insistence that many Slovaks of all ages put into dressing up. In Slovakia it is very clear that there is one type of acceptable wardrobe for the home and garden and a very different acceptable wardrobe if you plan to leave your property.  And especially elegant, in my opinion, is the standard by which many Slovak women dress to go to town.  Running for a bus on cobblestone, dressed well, in high heels somehow does not seem to faze a Slovak woman in the slightest.

On one’s property, it’s interesting to note that little more than one’s skimpy underwear is sometimes worn by both sexes when working out in the sun in Slovakia.  This can be an unflattering sight.  When leaving the home, even if just to run a few quick errands, many people take care to dress up.

Example 2 – The Observance of Sundays

Many American churches are packed on Sundays.  I won’t pretend that the same is true in Slovak churches.  In general, American churches seem to be a bit better at packing people in the door, but I’ve seen both extremes in both countries.  While it may not be a very strong time for organized religion in Slovakia, the Sabbath is observed nonetheless.  When I first came to Bratislava, the difference was VERY noticeable.

On Sundays there is little traffic, cars are clearly left unmoved, fewer people are out, most businesses are closed, even restaurants might be closed all day long.  Stores close up early or stay closed all day.  People stay at home or go to the garden.  Families lounge around.  A nicer meal is often eaten for Sunday lunch than what would be eaten during the rest of the week. The family might even all sit together at one time at the table.

Sunday is a different day than all the rest in Slovakia and you get the feeling that there is something sacred and special.  Not everything is for sale.  Across the border in Austria, which is in many ways much more westernized than Slovakia, aside from a church it is very difficult to find anything open at all.  It seems this tradition of honoring Sundays is widely appreciated.

A friend, whenever she would teaching the novel Like Water for Chocolate used to do an exercise with students where she asked them about their favorite traditions.  Often students would mention Sunday lunch as a favorite family tradition because it meant that the whole family would be together, which wasn’t true at other meals.

In the capital, Bratislava, this tradition is waning slightly, but it still seems true that many Slovaks, atheists included, consider their Sunday afternoons sacred time.

Example 3 – Train Travel is Elegant and often Pleasant

The communists did not plan for a car to be the birthright of every human being over the age of 18.  The tight traffic in Bratislava shows that the city was not ready for the current influx of cars.  This tight traffic happens even though many people still do not own a car.  The difficulty of parking in high density residential areas further illustrates this.  In some residential areas, every available piece of sidewalk doubles as a parking space and double parking tends to be normal.  The traffic problem was clearly not well-planned for in other cities around Slovakia either.  Public transportation, however, was encouraged by the government and the extensive train system remains from prior times.

There’s something classy and dignified about travelling by train.  You can get from point A to point B in style – legs crossed, sitting on a wide seat, which is akin to a stiff couch, in an enclosed compartment, separated from people trying to brush their way past you.  In such a scenario you might as well not have a care in the world, because you can’t help whether the train is on time or not. So, you unfold the newspaper that you’re carrying under your arm and enjoy the latest happenings of the world.  When you get there, you get there, as the beauty of nature zooms past you outside. Like a wealthy steel magnate being chauffeured to work, you can watch the landscape, dream about your next big plan, or heck, if you want to, just close your eyes.  Even if you just opt for second class with a seat reservation, the train will take you all over Slovakia in style.

Example 4 – Clothes Dryers

As I was not a child of the 1950′s, I have no idea how many American households in the 1950′s owned clothes dryers, but I’m guessing that they were an appliance of convenience and excessive wealth that came later in the century.

Out of the hundreds of homes I’ve been in around Slovakia, only once have I seen a clothes dryer (and that household was actually an American’s).  In Italian homes I’ve seen clothes dryers, enough so that I assume that they are commonplace in Italy.  This can be expected since Italy is part of the lazy and luxurious West.

In Slovakia, however, every single family seems to have a foldable-6-dollar-drying-rack that they cart out when the laundry is done and fold back up for storage the next morning after the clothing dries.  Even in the tiniest of apartments I’ve found this to be the case.  Before arriving in Slovakia never would I have been able to imagine that I did not NEED a dryer. That’s because I never had to imagine that problem.  That’s sort of a take on necessity being the mother of invention I suppose.

When I first got here, someone had to show me what to do with my wet laundry, and I was probably of the opinion that Slovakia was a backwards and messed up place when I saw no clothes dryers.  But it’s good to be placed into a situation where you’re forced to challenge what you think you know.  Before long I found myself wondering “Why on earth do so many Americans own clothes dryers?”

I’ll admit, when there’s something you really want to wash and wear that same day, not having a dryer can be a hassle – it does require extra forward thinking. Sometimes clothes get linty in Slovakia  (no dryers = no lint traps).  Sometimes jeans don’t regain their shape quite right.  And, on cold days, when nothing would feel better than a pair of socks or a sweatshirt right out of the dryer, it is easy to miss having a dryer.

In my opinion, in the year 2011, Slovakia is two steps ahead of any country that is reliant on dryers.  It’s more efficient; it’s cheaper; it’s not so hard on the clothes.  It makes Slovaks seem smarter for not needing such a cumbersome contraption to do such a simple job.  Sort of reminds me of the thousands of dollars of taxpayer money NASA spent on developing a pen that could write in outer space, upside down, and never leak.  The Soviets told their cosmonauts to just use pencils.

Example 5 – Pre-Lawsuits

I think that the term “good old-fashioned fun” in the U.S., somewhere under the surface, has something to do with a time where America was more relaxed and less litigious.

This one is not entirely fair to compare, because, well, we have no idea how lawsuit-happy Slovaks would be if their court system were able to be trusted to even occasionally accomplish anything in accordance with a semblance of justice and ethics.

More than once I’ve been asked by friends to go “collect” money from someone who owed him or her a debt – an invitation I’ve decline each time.  The implication was that a threat of force was needed to make the collection process more successful, the appearance of “muscle.”  The threat of taking someone to court in Slovakia is just so darn meaningless.  The process is long, you might get a judgement in your favor, and the judgement will probably not help you collect the money both you and the judge believe you are owed.

But the fact is, no matter what the cause of the scenario, Slovaks are not litigious.  When you step onto a bus in Bratislava, you can tell who is American and who is Slovak.  The American does something stupid like stand next to the gigantic, powerful, iron, door-closing-contraption. Where an American comes from, the gigantic, powerful, iron, door-closing-contraption would never exist because it’s so dangerous.  The Slovak on the bus, from the littlest nincompoop of a child to the most hunched over elderly miser, has the sense of not putting his foot next to the closing contraption.  Inevitably, the American will eventually learn that doing so is a bad idea – you will get hurt, no one will feel bad for you, the ambulance won’t come for you.  If you finally do convince the ambulance to come for you they are going to charge you a lot of money for making them come to you for something so incredibly frivolous.

The Slovak on the other hand, seems to behave more responsibly at all times as if thinking  to himself or herself “I am in charge of keeping myself safe, if I do not keep myself safe, despite the many promises of my government, I will most likely be left to die right there on the street, as people walk by me and avoid eye contact. And if I am rescued, I will have earned the unceasing ridicule of family and friends for my lack of commonsense, so much so that I will come to question whether it might not have been better to have stayed laying on the sidewalk with my broken leg until I died of dehydration three days later.”

Yes, I even believe that just three minutes sitting on a bus in Slovakia can make an observant American think “Man, are we a bunch of common-sense lacking weenies.”  Or maybe he or she might think “This place is senselessly dangerous.”   Either way, there is a noticeable difference in what safety means and who is responsible for keeping a person safe.

Everywhere you turn in Slovakia there are holes, things you can trip over, slip on, have dropped on you, run into, or poke an eye out with.  There is really death right around the corner, yet people don’t fall into, for example, the sewer on the path near my house that was left uncovered for about four years.

Nope, Slovaks are street smart in many ways.  And they often aren’t weenies either.  I don’t know how many times I’ve seen a random elderly man or woman brutally fall and then pick themselves up, dust themselves off and get right on the next bus, so they could go home to nurse their wounds.  Calling the ambulance here usually seems like something that is just outside of the Slovak character.  These people can be tough.

And, well, back to the issue of “good old fashioned fun.”  There’s a place called Slovensky Raj that has the longest, ricketiest, most wet and slippery ladders around.  It’s a national park filled with natural waterfalls, where you can just scramble up a five-story ladder as a water fall sprays you in the face.  It’s pretty stupid to do and as I have said – SO MUCH FUN!  If you are in Slovakia, and able-bodied enough to do it, you must hike Slovensky Raj, especially the “Sucha Bela” trail.

I would give Slovensky Raj about three days in the U.S. before it were closed down by court order.  The name, incidentally, translates as “Slovak Paradise,” and that it is indeed.  A trip up Sucha Bela means you will be hiking through river beds, scrambling over wooden ladders that are still standing, scrambling around old fallen wooden ladders, pausing to admire the amazing gorge you’ve found yourself in, walking though a waterfall, trying not to slip off of tall ladders as you get spritzed in the face by that waterfall.  It’s the kind of hike that makes you feel alive.  The hike is mandatory annually for my friends and I.

Because I’ve been on the hurt end of a Slovak 911 call (I wasn’t the one hurt), I am pretty certain that if you did fall off a ladder at Slovensky Raj and live long enough to call for help, the first thing that mountain rescue would do (provided that you were not mortally wounded) would be to badger you with questions that made you admit your own stupidity before they pressed on tender and painful spots to torture you, and then would take a few minutes to laugh at your stupidity before finally tending to your concerns. If you were mortally wounded, I think they would hurry to take care of you much more comfortably.

This is not a litigious place because, it’s not a place, often enough, where you can get away with successfully blaming others for your own stupidity.

The lack of litigiousness puts much of the blame for self-protection in the hands of the individual and allows others to offer opportunities for a great deal of fun.

A Jewish professor of mine once told me one difference that he perceived between a Jewish family and a Christian family.  In a Christian family, the parent’s love is unconditional.  In a Jewish family Mommy’s love is unconditional, Daddy’s love is conditional.  If you screw up, you’re gonna remember it.  If this professor of mine spoke the truth, then love from strangers in Slovakia is a lot like his Jewish father – conditional.  You cannot expect a stranger to cry over your own stupidity and you seldom can expect it from a friend.

That common Slovak attitude does not welcome litigiousness.

Example 6 – Eating Lard is Allowed

Lard is consumed – Yes, lard is consumed.

In case you do not know what lard is: Huge chucks of fat are cut from a pig and then cooked until all the liquid comes out.  The liquid is cooled and then called lard.

In Slovakia, it’s eaten on bread.  It’s used for cooking.  The tastiest food has lard in it – from pie crusts to biscuits.  While in the U.S., it’s socially and medically verbotten to eat lard and has been for decades, health and fitness commentators like this one or this one would all say that Slovakia’s got this one right – natural lard, and butter are better for a human body than artificially engineered alternatives like margarine.

Pork is also eaten in Slovakia, plentifully, especially the fattiest parts.  Calories, diets, running, food groups, nutrients are all things that might be discussed from time to time in Slovakia, but in all honesty, no scientist, no dietician seems to have any more of an understanding of what is good and nourishing for a child than that child’s own mother.

Our American way of dissecting the diet and trying to build it back together around acceptable nutrients feels so artificial.  Lots of the things we eat don’t really even qualify as “food,” according to author Michael Pollan in his books The Omnivore’s DilemmaIn Defense of Food, and Food Rules.  Pollan also makes this argument about the American diet while juxtaposing them with the traditional diets of other cultures.

The Slovak idea of nutrition seems so natural and ingrained in the culture.  You take some potatoes and add cheese and bacon and you have a meal.  Every few days, you make sure you get some meat, eat it with potatoes and you have a meal.  Always start a meal with soup, but make sure you have bread with it.  Never eat eggs without bread, it’s bad for you. These are all ideas I’ve been exposed to regarding proper diet in Slovakia.  I’m sure there are hundreds of other cultural “rules” that I see around me, but that I’ve never had verbally pointed out to me and that are probably seldom verbalized in Slovakia.

Somehow, without any scientific theories, Slovaks seem to know what to eat and what not to eat based on how they are feeling.  They know how much to eat and how much to exercise based on how they are feeling.  I wonder if anything new can be taught by nutritionists following the American method of deconstructing every meal.  For example, in Slovak culture, ultimately, it doesn’t matter if your mother’s homemade sauerkraut is rich in probiotics that benefit your gut and that your bacteria flora is so important for your health that it’s referred to as your “second immune system” by some, such as Tim Ferriss in his book 4 Hour Body. You just know that you like it and you’ve always liked it.  It seems like   America has no national cuisine to speak of.  Slovaks do and it keeps them alive.

With the news reporting every ten minutes that some food is either 1. bad for you or 2. a cure for cancer, there’s much comfort in how Slovaks just eat the meals they know: the meals that make them feel nourished.  It offers something to hang onto in this sea of turbulent health imperatives constantly being flung around.  There’s a lot of money to be made in making someone paranoid about their health, which means I always need to be careful when some expert on TV is trying to sell a book, or a diet, or a new contraption, because it’s hard to tell when he or she is entirely telling the truth instead of simply marketing a health product.  Even if it is the truth, it’s easy to forget that scientific theories are only theories, ready to be tested and disproven at any moment.

No credible scientist can claim to know the absolute truth, only to put forth a theory that may one day be laughed at, one day be lauded. When we forget that the job of scientists is to theorize and support and the job of media is to blow things out of proportion, well we have a society in the hands of a bad combination.

Centuries of experimentation go into the construction of a national cuisine.  While America is in a period of little thought and much action about cuisine, it is nice to be exposed to Slovakia, where nourishment is often not worried about, but rather intuited.  And sometimes, in all honesty, sacrificing myself to this Slovak intuition is hard to do, but offers much potential for learning.

Example 7 – Drinking Alcohol is Allowed

Drinking Alcohol is Allowed and Encouraged in Polite Company – do business with a Slovak of a certain age and there is practically guarantee that homemade hard alcohol will make an appearance.  It’s part of showing hospitality.

It’s even acceptable in many other areas of culture.  On the job, for instance.  An attorney from Pennsylvania once told me that the seminal moment that caused him to fall in love with Slovakia was when he was driving down the road about 8 a.m., saw a construction crew and one of the guys put down his shovel to take a tall swig from a bottle of hard alcohol.  Not forbidden here, encouraged.

Most Slovak bartenders couldn’t make a decent cocktail to save their lives, but that’s just because Slovaks take their alcohol straight up.  As long as a person can control himself around alcohol, there doesn’t seem to be many societal prohibitions that dictate when a person is an alcoholic.  There are no prohibitions against morning drinking, there are no prohibitions against social drinking, there are no ways to identify a wino, other than the fact that you see he can no longer control it or himself.  Alcohol is A-OK here in Slovakia.  A part of life.  For many it is a part of jokes and humor, something forced into your hand when you enter a friendly house, and poured for you when you sit down for a meal, pulled out on a long hike, or a hard day of work.  The signal to your host that you want more is not that you asked for it, but simply finishing what you already had.  It is always there as part of the culture.  Nothing taboo about it.  Nothing to make you feel bad.  I watch a show like Mad Men, and I see, well, Slovakia.  If there is any truth to the show’s portrayal of the ease with which Americans of the 1950′s sat down for a drink, then it’s a whole lot like Slovakia, where there’s no social stigma to going for a cup of coffee or a beer when out with a friend during the day.

The lunch lady at the school I used to teach at brought a bottle of champagne once and served it to all the teachers in the 15 minute break between the 2nd and 3rd hour class.  They toasted, drank up and headed to class.  No one got drunk and most likely no one was off their game during the next hour.  Responsible consumption of alcohol is a welcome and accepted part of life here, with few exceptions.

At the same time, interestingly, there is a zero tolerance policy toward drinking and driving.  One would not expect this to go hand in hand with a cultural policy of responsible drinking, but perhaps that is evidence that drinking and driving is a problem in Slovakia.  Some historians go back and read the laws of history to determine what the concerns of the people were and the crimes that were common in those cultures.  From their reading of history, it is unlikely that a law against robbery would be put into place if there was no robbery, or if no one was bothered by robbery.  For example, most American states do not have a law on breaking glass with your bare feet in a public place because few people feel concerned with such a problem.

Example 8 – Pig Killings

In this article from last year, I sing my praises of the Slovak tradition of Pig Killing. Many boys and girls in Slovakia grow up with an understanding of how to raise a pig, kill a pig, butcher a pig, and make traditional foods using virtually all of its parts.  This is true whether or not they live in rural areas.  You’ll regularly even find people in Bratislava who know this practice. Slovaks seem to have a very close relationship with their ancestral villages and with the cycle of life as well.

When watching how naturally Slovaks of either gender and all ages get along in this environment, it is hard to feel anything but admiration – it really feels like a way man was supposed to live.  It really feels like a bit of knowledge that every human should understand.  As with other things on this list, that tradition has enjoyed a resurgence in the U.S. – being far from the earth doesn’t cut it for some people.  Some American companies even gives lessons in the U.S. on raising and butchering the Mangalitsa pig (which is from Central Europe) using the technique of seam butchery (also from Central Europe).

At least among a small group of people, butchering a pig at home seems to be enjoying a resurgence in the U.S.  How ironic that Slovak culture is beginning to abandon this more traditional way of life, while some Americans are looking back to the past for a less modern way of life. Perhaps a lesson to be learned from America’s mistakes is that tradition should not easily be dispensed with.  While I don’t imagine that every American butchered his own meat in the 1950′s, I do have the idea that Americans, even urban American, had a more intimate understanding of nature and the life cycle than many urban Americans do today.

Example 9 – Eating Out

Eating out is not common among Slovaks

It’s really a special thing when a family goes out for a meal together.  A daughter’s graduation from university, a grandmother’s death, a son getting married, a father turning fifty.  These are reasons that I have seen Slovak families out for a meal together.  Less true in Bratislava, more true among the other 95% of Slovakia.  Instead:

Example 10 – Homemade Meals

A homemade meal is very common in many families.  In fact, even a homemade meal made from scratch is common.  Despite so many women in Slovakia working, the idea remains that a mother who would not see to it that there was a warm meal for her family to eat, even if it means each member of the family heating it up themselves, is a mother who is not playing her part in watching out for her family.

The responsibility of the woman in the family is so great that I wonder if an argument can be made that Slovakia in some ways is a matriarchal society.  But that is a much different topic, perhaps for another time.  Mom makes sure a meal is cooked; mom often cooks; eating out is an infrequent option for many families.   Does that sound like the U.S. in the 1950’s?

And an aspect of that homemade meal is:

Example 11 – Cooking from Scratch

They are often made from scratch.  When I first came here, it was almost impossible to find pre-made mixes for anything.  The biggest grocery store I knew was tiny and the pre-made items were just plain bad or pretty darn scarce.  It seemed like there was simply not much of a market for pre-made foods, and that’s speaking about Bratislava, by far the most westernized part of Slovakia.

Just a few years ago I was in Terchova (where the Slovak folk hero Janosik is from) in the North of Slovakia and that Friday afternoon I wanted to stop in at the local grocery store to find a piece of meat.  I was going to cook a pot of gulas so that my friends and I would have food all weekend long. I had a hard time finding what I needed, so I approached one of the clerks who was standing near the lunch meat and asked “Where can I find a piece of meat for gulas?”

She responded, as naturally as could be: “Tuesday.”

Grocery stores have become increasingly convenient options for homemakers over the last decade, but to this day flour takes up a significant amount of space in grocery stores.  While the pre-made foods market is surely growing, it is clear that Slovaks buy flour for more than just baking a cake for a special occasion.  Buying simple items and making a meal from scratch continues to be how many recipes in many Slovak kitchens are regularly made.

Just look at websites like SlovakCooking.com, or Eastern European Food, which have many recipes that do not use pre-made ingredients.  Things like microwave dinners and pre-made halusky every few months are increasingly finding more and more space in grocery stores shelves, but these foods still seem to be part of the exception rather than the rule.  Mixes for cakes, breads, puddings, pasta sauces, soups are all becoming increasingly common.

I understand cooking wholesome food can be time consuming.  At the same time, the more processing a food goes through, the more nutrition it looses.  Based on my time in Slovak homes, it is clear to me that mixes are a helpful addition in the cooking process, but that many families continue to appreciate eating foods that have not been pre-processed.

Example 12 – Political Correctness is Unwelcome

No such list would be complete without an attack on political correctness.  The concept of political correctness is that what is unpopular is incorrect.  Political is attached to the term because it even actually goes a step further, because not only does it make judgments about what is correct or incorrect before hearing any argument, it also makes prescriptions about how one should speak, based on what is understood to be correct for politicians. It is the idea that one should speak at all times as if he or she were running a political campaign and attempting not to say anything difficult for a voter to hear.

The idea of being aware of who you are speaking to when in a conversation is important.  There is no need to insist on hurting a person’s feelings.  Not everyone is ready to understand your view of the world just because you are ready to express it.  The movement of political correctness makes it difficult for a person to share those viewpoints even with someone who is ready to hear it.  There is a whole list of things that should not be mentioned, or questioned ever and that list is essentially determined by what would feel right to say if you were a politician running for office trying to speak with as little substance as possible and to offend as few people as possible.

This ideology has been very difficult for America, because it has harmed some of our public discourse.  Instead of being open and honest, it is considered most important not to offend.  In reality, if the ultimate goal were not to never offend, we would have to always use words with as little substance as possible.  Before the internet began to catch on as a medium of communication, I genuinely believe that political correctness had the potential to limit all thought provoking controversial expression from American media and perhaps even from academia.

The internet has prevented that possibility.  The internet became an outlet for anyone to say anything to anyone who will listen.  Instead of now needing a large investment to buy ink, paper, and a printing press, now virtually anyone has their own printing press on the internet.

Coming to Slovakia and seeing how drastically differently Slovaks approached this topic was like a breath of fresh air to me.  These two points are closely related, with a small distinction:

Slovaks are Straight Shooters

Ask them what they think and they will tell you.  Beware!!   If you ask a Slovak “Do you think this business model will work?”  or “Do you think he’s the right man for me?”  or “Would you trust this doctor with your life?” or “What do you think of what President so-and-so just announced?” you will most likely be in for a brutally honest appraisal of the situation, one that will leave even the most ardent supporter of a plan curious if he’s perhaps a little too sure of himself.  One will learn quickly here that asking the opinion of too many people will guarantee stultification.  At the same time, it feels good to be successful, yet firmly grounded in reality by those around you.  It feels good to know that you don’t have to look far to find someone who won’t pull punches in their appraisal of you.

And this type of attitude bears some relation to Slovakia’s lack of interest in political correctness:

The phrase “I’m offended” is virtually meaningless here.  Even Slovaks who speak amazing English and try to use that phrase don’t seem to use it quite right.  The idea that hurt feelings are a reason to stop an intellectual discussion does not seem to cut it in Slovakia.  The idea that the truth must be tempered based on whose feelings might be hurt doesn’t cut it in Slovakia.  Interestingly, despite the American guarantees of freedom of speech, we have developed an ability to see to it that speech is not really all that free.  At the same time, Slovaks, with an extended history of a lack of freedom of speech are entirely unwilling to hold back on what’s on their mind in many situations.

One key example is with a guest.  With a guest, a Slovak is likely to tread lightly.  You might not hear the full extent of what your host is thinking, but give the host permission to speak freely and there is no limit to what might come out of his or her mouth.  Any –ism you can think of may be expressed by any person in society.  Slovakia is not a place for the faint of heart, not a place for those who were raised to believe that it is their God given right to never hear an offensive thought spoken in their presence.  In this way Slovakia can feel base and mean, but I must tell you that it also feels so very refreshing sometimes to hear what’s on a person’s mind, even if that is the most stunningly perceptive criticism of that which you hold so dear.

This concept goes beyond the idea of decorum that I have come to understand of America in the 1950′s.  It might feel just rude from an American perspective today or in the 1950′s.  The idea that there should be self-censorship that limits a person to suggesting only ideas that may be “politically correct” seems like an American idea that developed in the later part of the 20th century.  In an intellectual debate, anything goes in Slovakia.  Often, in any kind of open discussion, anything goes.

Slovakia is a place that lives largely ignorant of the American blight of political correctness.

I don’t know if this is descriptive of America in the 1950′s, but it is an example of a country that has yet to see (or has perhaps rejected) a movement toward political correctness.

And finally.

Example 13 – A Slovak Man Should Always Be a Gentleman to the Ladies

A man meeting a lady should take her hand in his and kiss her on both cheeks, should open a door for a woman, should carry her groceries, should be courteous at all times.  Even some of the more feminist American women that I have met in Slovakia swoon just a little when they are treated by Slovak men as the fairer sex.

American men, me included, have been left confused at where a nearly culture-wide feminist pursuit of equality in America leaves such displays of kindness.  Will a woman be mad at you?  Will she feel offended?

Slovak men, largely, do not care.  They will even go so far as to scold a woman who will be so proud as to not let a well-intentioned man do something kind for her.  Women are the fairer sex and there’s nothing wrong with a man showing a little bit of human kindness.  This is yet another lesson that Slovak men might have to teach American men.  A little less sensitivity and uncertainty in holding a door for a woman and a little more determination will probably leave both the man and the woman feeling a little better about the kindness shown.  Be looking for opportunities to show kindness to another person help and act on those opportunities unapologetically.

So, to return to my question.  Does it sound like the 1950′s in America?  Does it sound like an older era, no matter what country you’re from?  Does it sound like Slovakia is “stuck” in an age of development that others have passed through?  I don’t mean anything negative with the word “stuck.”  Being stuck on good behavior is a good thing from my perspective.  And, of course, I must ask.  Are any of these qualities better?  Are any of them worse?  If Slovakia is “stuck” in some of its traditions, isn’t being “stuck” in a good tradition a good thing?  I think you know how I lean on these matters, but I’d like to hear some of your thoughts.

Allan Stevo writes on Slovak culture at www.52inSk.com.  He is from Chicago and spends most of his time travelling Europe and writing.  You can find more of his writing at www.AllanStevo.com.  If you enjoyed this post, please use the buttons below to like it on Facebook or to share it with your friends by email.  You can sign up for emails on Slovak culture from 52 Weeks in Slovakia by clicking here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Getting Ron Paul Supporters Re-Energized by Allan Stevo

by ALLAN STEVO on APRIL 13, 2012
in RON PAUL

Ron Paul People 2

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Will Ron Paul Strive to Become a Third Party Loser or a Republican Winner?

The year is not 1912 when three serious candidates ran in the general election for the White House. The year is 2012 when simply getting on the ballot is enough for third parties to cheer.

I’m not the partisan type and the weak “success” of simply getting Ron Paul on the ballot won’t be enough for me to even break a smile this autumn. I want to see Ron Paul in the White House. That will be success.

When I look my children in the eye and tell them the history of the revolution, the minor victory of ballot access for Ron Paul will not be mentioned. Ballot access is an important fight. It’s a step in the right direction. But right now in the spring of 2012 with Rick Santorum leaving the race, we are confronted with a choice. Will we Ron Paul supporters continue to take over one of the two major parties, or will we settle for a third party run?

Here’s a Brief Checklist of How a 3rd Party Run Will Look:
* Continuing the trend of poor media mention
* Getting blamed for four more years of Obama
* Helping to build the base of a third party
* Reducing fundraising potential
* Increasing talk of “unelectability”
* Losing some significant percentage of Republican partisan support, gaining of minimal support in return
* Getting a percentage (maybe 5 or 10%) of dissatisfied voters on top of the nonpartisan Ron Paul base
* Having the opportunity to teach a lesson to the Republican establishment that the Republican establishment is not bright enough to listen to – “If you don’t make room for us in the GOP, we will take a victory from you any time we want.”

There are good and bad aspects to a third party run, but the only reason to bring up a third party run for Ron Paul for the White House in 2012 is if you’ve resolved to lose. That’s the sad fact of national politics in America in the year 2012. And the only way you’ve resolved to lose is if you are not following accurate delegate counts. Accurate delegate counts acknowledge that very few delegates have been decided. Iowa, for example, was not decided on January 3 and will not be decided until June 16.

Additionally, if one has resolved to lose then that person probably isn’t paying attention to what is happening at local Republican parties in state-after-state. The party insiders are losing their own party. Ron Paul supporters have become so strong in some state Republican parties that it is very unlikely that Mitt Romney will get much more than lukewarm help from his own party.

We are not even 15 weeks into a 9 month primary process. By the end of this weekend, only four states out of the 50 will have held some form of state convention(North Dakota, Wyoming, Tennessee, and Colorado) – something that not every state will have, but that most will. This process has barely begun. Right now, while we are in the thick of a fight, now is not the time to give in.

What it is the right time to do is to turn off that depressing television that never mentions Ron Paul, to stop your subscription to that depressing paper, and to instead spend your time and money bolstering that lone man carrying the message of truth to the people across the country. If your state hasn’t voted yet (which is the case for 48.9% of Americans) then you should vow to recruit 10 voters to join you in voting for Ron Paul. If your state has voted already, then stay involved with the process. Get involved with the Republican Party, try to become a delegate and dig deep in giving to Ron Paul’s campaign in his April 15 money bomb. Importantly and often forgotten – get out there to motivate other Ron Paul supporters to do exactly the same thing. We are in the early stages of this year’s primary fight and now is not the time to give up on that fight.

The only effect of resolving to lose is that you hand victory to your opponent. I’m not just saying we should make the opponent work for it. I’m saying WE CAN WIN THIS.

Here’s a Brief Checklist of How a GOP Run for Ron Paul Will Look:
* Ron Paul becomes the man who must be debated by the President.
* Ron Paul becomes the man who can and will hold Obama’s feet to the fire in those debates.
* Ron Paul becomes the only alternative to Obama.
* Ron Paul inspires, which will make him not just an “anybody but” candidate. “Anybody but” candidates, after all, have a very high rate of failure - 100%.
* Ron Paul becomes the candidate who takes from Obama’s own base and who wins the independent vote; this nearly guarantees a presidential victory against Obama one-on-one.
* Ron Paul becomes the man who has the leverage to inspire a national debate, a national discussion between neighbors.
* Ron Paul has the potential to win the presidency and secure control of the GOP from the statist neo-cons for at least a generation.
* Ron Paul has the potential to grow and consolidate an organized anti-war movement within a party.

I mean seriously, there’s no contest between which of these two options is better – 3rd party run or GOP run. Of course, one is much harder than the other, but the rewards are so much more meaningful in the harder contest. A year ago the mainstream media distracted from the important issues by insisting it knew who the front runner was – Pawlenty, Bachman, Perry. Who were they kidding?

You can fault them, the media, for weakening our movement if you choose(I don’t), but by that same logic you should also fault anyone who has spent the last year talking about a Ron Paul third party run whether that person saw themselves as an enemy of Paul’s or a friend. A third party run helps that third party, but from where I stand in April of 2012 it weakens our movement.

Our candidate is the finest thinker among any American politician living today. He deserves the publicity of being mainstream and prime time. That’s not what third party will offer us. We must not abandon an opportunity for success.

Mitt Romney doesn’t have the delegates today, and I don’t think Romney will get the delegates, but that relies on those of us in the liberty movement who want to see a win. Ron Paul’s victory, our victory, is a self-fulfilling prophecy. If we want it, we will work hard for it and will work effectively for it. If we work hard and effectively for it, we will get it.

We are Ron Paul’s secret weapon. Twenty states and 1,047 delegates worth of process have yet to start. Few delegates have been decided out of the 2,286 total. It’s looking increasingly likely that Iowa will be a monstrous Ron Paul victory – our most formidable competitor in that state just left the race. Despite what happened in the caucuses on January 3, Iowa has yet to have a state convention (again June 16, 2012 is the scheduled date), which means Iowa has not yet been “won” by anyone. At state conventions the mandatory delegate bindings can be unbound. Maine, Nevada, Colorado, and many others might look exactly the same – strongly in favor of Ron Paul. What will the GOP do when thousands of us show up at Tampa to insist that the voices of our thousand Ron Paul delegates be heard?

What should the plan for us grassroots supporters be at this point? For each one of us who wants a Ron Paul win to redouble our efforts.

Make sure you get ten friends out to vote, donate to the campaign, read posts and books that talk about ways to work more effectively on behalf of liberty – then get out and do those things.

You and I are Ron Paul’s secret weapon. Without us he ends up being just another politician trying to talk over the din of the media. With us he can speak through us to our friends. With us his message reaches people it never would have otherwise.

What should the strategy of the official campaign be at this point? To me that’s irrelevant. Winning the White House is up to us, and if we push forward for Ron Paul he’ll be the next president of the U.S. whether he likes it or not. Not the media, not the party insiders, not a single person can stop us from making Ron Paul the President if we each resolve to make that happen.

Allan Stevo is author of How to Win America for Ron Paul and the Cause of Freedom in 2012. The book can be downloaded by readers of the Daily Paul here free of charge.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Ron Paul does not owe Mitt Romney or GOP any loyalty

This review written about “How to Win America for Ron Paul and the Cause of Freedom in 2012″ appeared on newsroomjersey.com.

BY MURRAY SABRIN
10 April 2012

Allan Stevo has written a comprehensive campaign blueprint for liberty candidates. Stevo lays out practical advice for Ron Paul supporters and future liberty candidates who believe winning elections will help restore freedom in America. Unfortunately, it was published too late for this presidential cycle. Stevo’s primer may have had a greater impact this year if it was published in mid-2011.

According to Allan Stevo, the 32-year-old writer and former congressional candidate and author of “How to Win America for Ron Paul and the Cause of Freedom in 2012,” which was published in January of this year (while a free e book is available here), winning elections is more likely if voters at the grassroots level work “the plan.” Stevo lays out “the plan” to elect Ron Paul in 2012. He explains why Ron Paul should win, could win and how it is up to his supporters to make that happen by working what he calls their “social precincts.” The first part of “How to Win America….” lays out the nuts-and-bolts of winning the votes of individuals who will go to the polls and select the GOP presidential nominee and liberty candidates in general. As Stevo writes on page 74:

“If you are convinced, if you are moved to action, please stop reading this book now. Please put it down, and get to work. Come back and read the rest when you need a little inspiration or would like a tip. Don’t read it if you simply have nothing better to do, please. If you have nothing better to do, I’d like you to be out following the plan. We follow that plan and we will be the clear winners at the end of the primaries. Ron Paul will be the Republican candidate, well-positioned to win the Great Debate.”

Despite Stevo’s optimistic assessment in January about Ron Paul becoming the GOP presidential nominee, the fact that the Texas congressman is not the leading GOP presidential contender at this time after spending tens of millions of dollars to convince primary voters that his message of limited government, individual liberty, sound money and an noninterventionist foreign policy is right for America, speaks volumes about GOP voters and missed opportunities throughout the campaign. In addition, there is ample evidence that the mainstream media played a role in marginalizing Dr. Paul’s campaign as early as last August’s Ames, Iowa straw poll which he nearly won, yet the media focused its coverage on former Minnesota governor Tim Pawlenty who came in a disappointing third and soon dropped out of the race.

Although Stevo downplays the role of the media’s effects on the presidential primaries, the bias of so-called journalists during the two dozen debates came though crystal clear, not only with their superficial questions at times and ignoring Ron Paul during the debates as much as possible,(who could forget the 89 seconds CBS gave the congressman in one of the debates), but their nightly newscasts rarely gave him equal time with the other candidates, implying his “unelectability.” In other words, was there a concerted effort to ignore presidential candidate Ron Paul and therefore silence his message of peace, freedom and limited government? To ask the question, is to answer it.
However, Ron Paul’s campaign spokespersons should have jumped all over the media for repeating this mantra, which became a self-fulfilling prophecy, because the more the talking heads said it, the more the public believed it and the more voters perceived that voting for the Texas congressman was a “wasted” vote. In short, Paul campaign’s media folks should have pounced on television and cable producers and editors and called them out for their disingenious reporting. For the media, Ron Paul has been a “third party’ candidate in the GOP primary, especially inasmuch as he has been the only candidate who has been asked about running as a third party candidate in November.

In another vein, the GOP establishment did not want Ron Paul—to put it mildly–to be the presidential standard bearer. To guarantee that Ron Paul would not get any momentum in the primaries, the January Iowa caucus was the firewall. If Ron Paul had won what in effect was the Iowa beauty contest kicking off the primary season, the media could not have ignored this phenomenon (wanna bet?). But if Ron Paul had won the Iowa caucuses and rolled into New Hampshire the following week and knocked off Romney or come in a close second, he could have claimed a “victory” just like Bill Clinton did in 1992, when he proclaimed himself the “comeback” kid even though he lost the primary to Massachusetts Senator Paul Tsongas.

What if? We will never know the answer to these questions, but there is enough anecdotal information that the vote counters (GOP party officials) have been less than honest in counting the votes for Ron Paul throughout the primaries. Moreover, when the time came to select delegates at local GOP caucuses to choose individuals to attend state conventions where the state GOP would select delegates to the national convention in Tampa, more shenanigans occurred to prevent Ron Paul supporters from becoming delegates.

What now? Should Ron Paul run as an independent candidate in 2012 to carry his message of liberty to the American people in November, because a Obama-Romney race would be choice of a Democratic welfare-warfare state versus a Republican welfare-warfare state? If Ron Paul believes the American people deserve to have a choice in November and that the GOP is part of the problem along with the Democrats, then Ron Paul just might jump at the opportunity not only to reshape the political landscape in America by creating a pro-liberty political movement in contrast to the Washington Party in DC comprised of two wings, the Democrats and Republicans.

A Ron Paul independent presidential campaign in the fall would be exciting, a huge boost to the liberty movement, and would provide the American people with a real choice instead of listening to the big government nominees, Obama and Romney, continue the charade that there is a fundamental difference between Democrats and Republicans. In addition, Ron Paul does not owe any loyalty to the GOP or its nominee, because of the egregious treatment of the mild mannered physician from Texas by the political hacks who run the GOP throughout the country. Moreover, electing Romney or reelecting Obama would maintain the status quo in America. That means the welfare-warfare state continues, a triumph of crony capitalism.

Murray Sabrin is a professor of finance at Ramapo College and blogs at www.MurrarySabrin.com.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

From 52 Weeks in Slovakia: Photos: The Open Air Market on a Spring Day

Miletičova

March 30, 2012

Allan Stevo

One of the best parts of spring in Bratislava is a visit to the open air market, near the corner of Záhradnícka and Miletičova streets.  The market is colloquially called “Miletičova” or just “Miletička.”

One day you’ll get a lengthy piece of writing on the topic of the market.  The essay has been through some 20 drafts over the past year, but I don’t feel like it’s ready yet.  So, for now I’ll share some of the many photos I’ve taken at that market for the readers of 52 Weeks in Slovakia. If you like reading captions you can just place your cursor over a photo to see the caption of that photo popup in a bubble.

Few Saturday mornings in Bratislava can feel complete without a visit to the market.  While these aren’t going to be professional quality, as I am untrained in photography, here’s a glimpse at what a visit to the market looks like for me.

I hope you will enjoy it and will make a visit to the market a priority of your next springtime jaunt through Bratislava.

 

 

 

Have you ever been to Miletičova? As you can see, I find it to be one of the treasures of Bratislava.  Do you have a favorite open air market?  Do you like visiting places like these on your travels?  Do you ever get food fresh from farmers or other places that aren’t supermarkets?

Allan Stevo writes on Slovak culture at www.52inSk.com.  He is from Chicago and spends most of his time travelling Europe and writing.  You can find more of his writing at www.AllanStevo.com.  If you enjoyed this post, please use the buttons below to like it on Facebook or to share it with your friends by email.  You can sign up for emails on Slovak culture from 52 Weeks in Slovakia by clicking here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why We Shouldn’t Want the Media’s Help

A common complaint in the liberty movement is that the media is no help. For numerous reasons that’s an ideal situation for us.

The Media Offers No Help

There are plenty of media sources that censor Ron Paul. We can react to that in a variety of ways. The reasons media sources do not mention Ron Paul are numerous. The goals of not mentioning him are few and include – 1. Discouraging his supporters and 2. Distracting his supporters.

They underestimate the ardent Ron Paul supporters if they think a supporter will get discouraged by Ron Paul’s 89 seconds of time in a CBS debate. They underestimate us if they think a lack of mainstream media mention will get us down. They underestimate us if they think they will discourage us by acknowledging Ron Paul only when it looks like there’s an opportunity to discredit him. The media utterly fails at discouraging Ron Paul supporters, because largely they don’t understand the passion for freedom that Ron Paul supporters have. If you don’t “get” freedom, you’re going to have a hard time “getting” Ron Paul’s supporters.

What the media succeeds at is the second goal. Ron Paul supporters can get easily distracted. Ron Paul supporters flood comments sections, chat rooms, and Facebook fan pages and make a big show of the latest outrage on the internet. But NONE OF THAT MATTERS. Only one thing matters in a campaign and that is winning. Some will say Ron Paul runs to preach the message of freedom, that he runs for the sake of debate, that he runs to inspire the future generations. There are lots of better ways to do that than spending very long hours campaigning. The reason to run a campaign is singular – to win. All the rest can be nice secondary bonuses, but when the Republican National Convention convenes in late August 2012 in Tampa, Florida, the only thing we want is to see Ron Paul with the nomination. Without that, the campaign is lost. That’s all there is to it.

The way to beat every journalist and political analyst who laughs at Ron Paul and his supporters for their quaint notions of freedom is to win the GOP nomination.

A Media Myth

Here’s a funny thing about the media – they think they matter. Every Ron Paul supporter bringing 10 friends (And as you’re reading this, I hope you’re making a list of who those 10 supporters will be!) to the polls with him renders the mainstream media meaningless. Bring 10 friends and it won’t matter what the media says. Some will say it hasn’t mattered for a while, and I don’t think that’s really true, but today the mainstream media can, for the first time, be made worthless in a presidential election. We can nullify them.

We can make every smug journalist from Tallahassee to Kauai spit out his coffee morning-after-morning after reading on the internet about Ron Paul’s blazing success in the primaries the day before. You and I realize that interpersonal online connections matter, and that the mainstream media has in many ways stopped mattering. We will activate the networks we’ve spent years building, and we will use those networks to win the GOP nomination and then the U.S. presidency.

We Don’t Need The Old Media and We Shouldn’t Want Their Help

There are lies that can be told about every candidate. There are truths that can be spun to make every candidate appear ugly and to make it easier for any candidate to lose. When those attacks on Ron Paul begin, they will run rampant through the mainstream media with ease. When that happens, we will be grateful that we long ago gave up on the mainstream media and focused on building our own channels of communication instead of allowing the media to be the “communicator” of ideas for us.

The media had little to do with making Ron Paul popular – after all the people who learned enough about Ron Paul to want to vote for him did not learn about Ron Paul from the mainstream media – and therefore it would follow the media can do little to make Ron Paul unpopular. The members of our movement have generally learned not to pay the media much attention. While it has taken us a great deal of work to build these interpersonal networks that sidestep the media, it allows our movement to be much stronger, much more independent in its thoughts, and less prone to being influenced by the mainstream media.

To put a twist on a common political adage “A mainstream media strong enough to give you everything you want, is a mainstream media strong enough to take everything you have.”

The text in this post is an adapted excerpt from How to Win America for Ron Paul and the Cause of Freedom in 2012.

March 31, 2012

Allan Stevo [send him mail] is a writer from Chicago – author of LewRockwell.com’s #1 Best Selling book for the month of February, the recently released How to Win America for Ron Paul and the Cause of Freedom in 2012, a book on how Ron Paul supporters can secure the GOP nomination and with certainty deliver a presidential win for Ron Paul in 2012.

This piece first appeared at LewRockwell.com.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment
  • Every few weeks, I'll be sending out an email newsletter with links to my latest published work.

    Sign up here to see the latest hot off the presses.



    * = required field